Using OmniFocus to Shape Your Day

OmniFocus provides a place to document each and every commitment you’ve made; every phone call, errand, conversation, or information to process can be captured so you don’t spend precious cognitive power remembering what you need to do. In this regard, OmniFocus is not different from a notebook, text file, or spreadsheet–you can capture input any way you like. OmniFocus does, however, provide a singular interpretation of David Allen’s Getting Things Done, allowing the user to assign tags (contexts), projects, start and due dates, and other affordances (such as flags).

Every decision you make uses psychic energy. The true power of OmniFocus is its ability to help you hide what you don’t need to do. If you’re a busy person, you have 100+ items, some of which have dependencies that preclude your getting them done at any given moment. Time is finite, so how do you decide what to do each day?

Staring at a list of all of your remaining or available tasks is not conducive to getting things done. Neither, for that matter, is reviewing everything in OmniFocus each morning; there’s a Review feature in OmniFocus, and you should use it–but in GTD, the review is weekly, not daily. There’s a reason for this: the review is good bit of work.

The review is a place to consider each project and associated tasks. This is the time to see what is due soon, to check your hard landscape (calendar), and possibly even clear out other inboxes you’ve decided to use–physical or otherwise. And it’s not something you can likely squeeze into every morning.

The Evolution of Context

One of the tenets of GTD is organizing your work by contexts: that is, you put phone calls on a list of phone calls you have to make, so that when you’re at your desk, you can make those calls. Likewise, you might put anything that you could only do at your computer on a “computer” list. But things have changed. You don’t need to wait to be in the office to make phone calls or use a computer; you likely have much of that with you at any given time. Internet connections are almost ubiquitous. Your cell phone might have a more powerful processor than your aging desktop.

All of this is to say that contexts are less salient than they once were, at least in some cases, and OmniFocus reflects this evolution by dropping contexts as a feature (and a name) and replacing them with tags. Tags in OmniFocus work just like contexts, with the exception that you can assign multiple tags to an action–long a bone of contention for many users. Location-based tags can still be very meaningful, as can tags associated with specific people that you many not always be able to speak with.

An example from my personal use: I work in a public school district and frequent five school buildings. I use a tag for each of those buildings to allow me to see what, if any, business I can take care of while I’m in that particular school. Likewise, I have tags for each important person I may need to talk to while I’m there. An action that I need to talk with a certain building principal, for example, might be tagged with the school, the principal’s name, and even @phone.

What Should I Be Doing Right Now?

You can live out of your inbox, but it’s no way to advance your long-term projects. Doing so is a great way to have actions with due dates sneak up on you. Instead, you can harness OmniFocus to help winnow down the list of what you can work on to what you intend to get done. It allows you to take a week-long view, launching from your last review, and then narrow your focus to each day.

Again: You can’t look at your entire list of available actions every day. And with contexts being more nebulous than ever before, you need some other way to organize your work. This particular setup helps me focus:

  1. During the weekly review, flag any tasks that I would like to complete by the end of the week.
  2. Make sure that I see anything “Due Soon,” which I have set to within the next 2 days. (I believe the default is 5 days.)
  3. Tag actions that I want to complete today with the tag “Today.”
OF Status Available Flagged Today Due Soon
Description any task not on hold, deferred, or waiting on another action any flagged task any task tagged “Today” any task with a due date in the next 2 days1
Priority lowest this week high red alert

Note that “Today” is lower in priority than “Due Soon.” Actions tagged “Today” are things you intend to complete today, but you may have more time. You can renegotiate these items each day, depending upon emergent circumstances. Items with a due date, by contrast, really should be due on the date that you gave yourself. Arbitrarily assigning due dates that don’t correspond to external needs is bad juju and will gum up your GTD system.

Get Perspective(s)

You can spend most of your week between two or three perspectives, dipping into your Inbox to process as necessary.

Today: Your Today perspective should show you any actions that are due soon, and tagged “Today.”
Due/Flagged: A second perspective, which I call “Due/Flagged,” shows any actions that are due soon and/or flagged. You can just show flagged actions in another perspective if you like, since there’s overlap between the two.

I generally will work out of the Today perspective, and check Due/Flagged multiple times a week, if not daily.


1This is user-configurable; you can set “due soon” to mean however many days prior to the actual due date you like.

ChromeOS Languishes

David Ruddock, writing for Android Police:

But this “solution” has basically become an insult to Chrome’s users, forcing them to live inside a half-baked Android environment using apps that were almost exclusively designed for 6" touchscreens, and which exist in a containerized state that effectively firewalls them from much of the Chrome operating system. As a result, file handling is a nightmare, with only a very limited number of folders accessible to those applications, and the task of finding them from inside those apps a labyrinthine exercise no one should have to endure in 2019. This isn’t a tenable state of affairs—it’s computing barbarism as far as I’m concerned. And yet, I’ve seen zero evidence that the Chrome team intends to fix it. It’s just how it is.

GSuite allows users to have immediate access to all of their files, and the collaboration features are excellent. It’s not otherwise something users look forward to using. And Chromebooks are the same: they’re useful for a number of tasks, but unsatisfying for many users. Education loves them because they’re cheap and easy to manage.

Chrome OS has stalled out

Brydge Pro+ Brings a Trackpad to iPad

Via MacSparky: Brydge has announced a keyboard for iPad with a built-in trackpad. It will of course use Assistive Touch in iPadOS to provide input support. Apple’s own Smart Connector makes for a keyboard experience that precludes the user from thinking about charging, while Brydge requires Bluetooth and separate charging. Despite this disadvantage, this is going to be a great addition.

Brydge Pro+ | iPad Pro Keyboard | Brydge Technologies

Why It’s Expensive to Feed Your Kindle

Constance Grady, writing for Vox, on why ebooks aren’t cheaper than dead tree editions:

And because ebooks are often more expensive than Amazon’s heavily discounted print books, traditional publishing’s ebook sales seem to have fallen off — and Amazon is more dominant than ever in the print book market. “It’s so much cheaper,” says Friedman.

In this new market, high ebook prices make it harder than ever for young authors in particular to survive. “The split has really hurt debut novelists,” says Friedman. “It’s hard to ask readers to take a chance on someone unproven at that high price point, and since the ebook market does lean towards fiction, it’s hurting the new people.”

Despite the Department of Justice’s actions to stop Apple and the big publishers from attempting to establish an agency model, the agency model is, in fact, exactly what is functioning in the ebook market now. So while Amazon can offer deep discounts on print books, sellers can set the prices for ebooks.

The 2010s were supposed to bring the ebook revolution. It never quite came.

Eating Phô–Collected Wisdom

My youngest son and I went out on our umpteenth phô lunch today, and as always, I wondered about established protocol. I’d like to follow the cultural norms, but there’s nothing worse than a food snob. I took to the internet to collect some of the wisdom about how to eat phô.

Sauces

There’s often sriracha, plum sauce, fish sauce, and red chili sauce. I dosed my first few bowls of phô with red chili sauce just because I like spicy food. According to Matt Rodbard, however, you should try the broth first:

As mentioned, when the broth is good, it’s something to be savored. So to blast it with these sweet and spicy flavors, before giving it a chance, is sort of criminal. My condiment policy with phô is similar to my condiment policy with hamburgers. The best don’t need it.

Loving Phô, dedicated to all things phô, agrees:

Phô lovers judge the bowl of phô served to them in a restaurant by sipping the broth first without putting in any seasoning or garnishing.

I see many people (mostly non-Viet and younger Viet generation) dumping in sriracha and/or hoisin sauce into their phô as the bowls arrive at the table. My question is, don’t they wonder how the broth tastes? Is it good or is it not good phô broth? If it’s not good phô broth then maybe they should try a better place.

Tri Vo, however, thinks the sauces might be a welcome addition for those who are expecting a more robust flavor from their phô; like the Guinness in the US, it’s not the same:

But if you live in the United States, it’s unlikely you’re going to get anything remotely close to perfection, even from a Vietnamese-owned business. Not to mention, ethnic food in the United States has the tendency to be a little blander, so it can adapt to a variety of palettes and tastes. Adding Sriracha and hoisin sauce can make the already bland soup feel more like home, more like what it should be.

And one vlogger’s attempt at Columbusing phô led to a raft of comments that suggest the sauce issue isn’t settled even in the motherland.

This video shows my favorite technique: a little sauce in a condiment bowl, and you can drag meat or noodles inside.

The Mechanics

At the table, there is a spoon, as well as chopsticks. My question was, do I use the spoon to drink the broth and the chopsticks to pick out the noodles and meat? Or is the spoon for Americans who don’t chopstick?

Happily, it’s just fine to hoist the bowl up to your face after you eat the noodles and drink it. The spoon is there to help agitate and incorporate the ingredients, as well as to let you enjoy enjoy some broth before you’ve eaten the other stuff. First We Feast shows how you can use the spoon in concert with your chopsticks to get a nice bite of many ingredients at once. Thrillist, however, notes that you should move the noodles to your spoon using the chopsticks, and eat from the spoon.

In the end, though, perhaps Scott Berkun’s advice is the best of all:

It’s no surprise all the experts have their laws, rules and traditions to which i say hooey. Traditions are great to try at least once, but you should always remember every tradition we have was invented by someone who tried something different than what had been done before:

The Morning Show

Binge-watched The Morning Show over the holiday break. Like Star Wars: Rise of the Skywalker, I had heard that the critics were–ahem–critical, but that viewers were generally positive. Like Star Wars, I thought it was a good watch. Some reviews:

Lucy Mangan, The *Guardian*:

Aniston is flawless – wholly convincing as a woman both broken by and rightfully raging at Mitch’s betrayal, a force to be reckoned with and a person who has had it up to here with a lifetime of negotiating other people’s whims, needs and prejudices. Everyone else – especially Billy Crudup as the network suit playing seven-dimensional chess with everyone – matches her point for point. The script has depth and endless torque and the whole thing is an exhilarating rush that makes room for nuance, thought and – though it’s definitely a drama – humour.

The Morning Show review – Jennifer Aniston returns in a masterwork for the #MeToo era

Jen Chaney, *Vulture*:

There’s a strong sense of momentum and controlled chaos in The Morning Show that engages from the jump…once you get drawn into the center of all this swirling activity, you wind up wanting to stay.

The Morning Show Wants You to Watch

Robert Lloyd, LA *Times*:

It’s more like a Manhattan “Game of Thrones,” really, in which various forms of subtle, even polite skulduggery, backstabbing and under-bus-throwing are enacted and discussed, with a lot of attention paid to power and gender dynamics in the workplace. Characters fight to “control the narrative.” “I just need to be able to control the narrative so I’m not written out of it,” says Alex, who wants to keep her show. “Controlling narrative is more powerful than you can imagine,” Mitch will say many episodes later, as he tries to turn things to his advantage. (There is not much in the way of noble sacrifice.)

Review: Watch ‘The Morning Show’ to the end. It’s better than you’ve heard

iPad in 2020

Jason Snell, writing for MacWorld on what Apple may introduce in 2020:

If I ran the zoo, though, I’d consider beefing up iPadOS’s cursor support and building a new iPadOS device—let’s call it iBook, because I’m in charge now and won’t be denied—with attached keyboard and trackpad. An iOS laptop. All the pieces are in place. I’d love to see it—but alas, I don’t really think it will. 2020 is a weird-sounding year, but an iOS laptop is too weird even for 2020.

I think the mouse and keyboard support is likely: the ability for users to buy an iPad and some accessories and have all of their computing needs met. We’re not far from that now.

2020 iOS Predictions: iPad Pro and so many iPhones

The Influence of Kung Fu Movies on Hip Hop

Iron Fists and Kung-Fu Kicks on Netflix is an interesting documentary on the rise of the Kung-Fu movie. One of the most fascinating sections highlights the relationship between the genre’s signature kicks and physical stunts and the dance moves that came to be known as breakdancing.

Related from FactFile:

The Rock Steady Crew such as Kenneth Gabbert and Richard Colon state that breakdancing is influenced by Kung Fu movies and James Brown.

Iron Fists and Kung-Fu Kicks on Netflix

More on Special Education Funding

A bit more info on my post from yesterday on special education funding:

Special Education is unique in the State budget in that it falls under both the Adequacy Budget calculation and Categorical Aid. In addressing special education, the school funding law sought to discourage over-classification by districts. Consequently, Special Education Aid is not dependent on the number of special education students a district has. Instead, it is assumed that 14.78 percent of every district’s student population is classified as special education, with an additional 1.72 percent needing speech therapy.

Thing is, the 14% rate doesn’t reflect reality: NJ classified nearly 18% of its students in 2017.

School Finance 101: Special Education

Funding Special Education

Christina A. Samuels, writing for Education Week:

And then, there’s the money. Congress never funded the IDEA for the full amount that was authorized when the law was first signed. At that time, Congress estimated that it cost states twice as much to educate a student with disabilities as it does to educate a general education student, and the law authorizes the federal government to give up to 40 percent of that excess cost to states.

Congress has never come close to that mark; its $12.3 billion contribution in fiscal 2018 is more like 15 percent of the excess cost.

Those of use in special education as a profession cite this as a burden in conversation. New Jersey provides additional funding for special education but assumes that classified (eligible) students would never exceed about 14% of enrolled students. That’s just not true of so many districts.

Special Education Is Broken

K-Cups Take a Beating

Albert Burneko:

Of course, at any level even slightly more holistic than pure individualism, the Keurig looks quite different. The machine itself is exponentially more sophisticated and wasteful than even a commercial espresso maker, expensive to make and involving rare-earth computing materials and so forth. A box of plastic single-serving grounds containers (“K-Cups”) multiplies the packaging of a simple bag of coffee beans many times over. And then, to produce a quantity of coffee equivalent to that produced by, say, a single iteration of a drip coffeemaker’s brewing cycle, it must power through its much more mechanically elaborate brewing cycle over and over again, consuming electricity all the while, during which time it is of no use to anyone but the one person who will drink that serving of coffee. The farther back you pull from the immediate experience of one libertarian end-user unconcerned with anything beyond his own immediate experience, the worse it looks: For the individual, the Keurig has some claim to convenience and ease and efficiency; for, say, an office, or a household, it dramatically slows down and complicates the process of preparing coffee for everybody who wants some; for human society, it is a wasteful inefficiency; pound-for-pound, for terrestrial life as a global organism, if you are silly and sentimental enough to still entertain the idea of such a thing, it is an outrage.

On a related note, the NYT points out the high cost of coffee pods. We currently pay about 17 USD for a pound of La Colombe’s very good coffee.

How Not To Make Coffee