I have to rise a bit earlier to stick to my am rowing routine. This pretty much how it’s going:

How do you know you’re misusing due dates in your task management app? You’re setting due dates that are I wan to do by dates but that have no externally corresponding due date. In English: you’re assigning due dates to tasks that aren’t actually hard deadlines.

And a good sign that you’re doing that is you find yourself looking over your "Today" list and moving the date to the next day. Again. And again.

What’s wrong with this?

Nothing, really. But ultimately, due dates are when something is actually due. It’s a deadline.

"But I set a deadline for myself!" you might object.

Don’t do that.

Simpler task managers don’t offer many ways to bubble a task up to your awareness outside of due dates. But apps with more robust metadata, like Todoist and OmniFocus, to name a couple, can help you focus your attention on urgent and important tasks, while not tricking yourself with due dates.

My current example: I wrote about applying the Eisenhower Matrix to Todoist here on Uncorrected a while back. My particular system is a mashup of GTD and this method. Besides organizing tasks into projects with corresponding tags (context, in GTD parlance), I apply a P1 tag to things that are urgent and important (things I should do as soon as possible), P2 to things that are urgent but not important (things i have to plan), and important but not urgent (P3, not important but urgent), and can be delegated.

That organization scheme adds another processing step when getting things out of your inbox, so there’s some friction there. But it helps you focus when you find your "Today" perspective full of things you can keep pushing off to tomorrow. Working out of your P1 or Important/Urgent perspective keeps you moving forward, while things that are actually due today can appear in Today.

More here.

How do you know you’re misusing due dates in your task management app? You’re setting due dates that are I wan to do by dates but that have no externally corresponding due date. In English: you’re assigning due dates to tasks that aren’t actually hard deadlines.

And a good sign that you’re doing that is you find yourself looking over your "Today" list and moving the date to the next day. Again. And again.

What’s wrong with this?

Nothing, really. But ultimately, due dates are when something is actually due. It’s a deadline.

"But I set a deadline for myself!" you might object.

Don’t do that.

Simpler task managers don’t offer many ways to bubble a task up to your awareness outside of due dates. But apps with more robust metadata, like Todoist and OmniFocus, to name a couple, can help you focus your attention on urgent and important tasks, while not tricking yourself with due dates.

My current example: I wrote about applying the Eisenhower Matrix to Todoist here on Uncorrected a while back. My particular system is a mashup of GTD and this method. Besides organizing tasks into projects with corresponding tags (context, in GTD parlance), I apply a P1 tag to things that are urgent and important (things I should do as soon as possible), P2 to things that are urgent but not important (things i have to plan), and important but not urgent (P3, not important but urgent), and can be delegated.

That organization scheme adds another processing step when getting things out of your inbox, so there’s some friction there. But it helps you focus when you find your "Today" perspective full of things you can keep pushing off to tomorrow. Working out of your P1 or Important/Urgent perspective keeps you moving forward, while things that are actually due today can appear in Today.

More here.

Here’s this week’s list of things to check out:

1. Endgrain Coffee Brewed in a Chemex coffee brewer: I wrote about purchasing a Chemex recently after eight years of prevarication. I took it into the office after using it at home last weekend. I’m missing having it at home and might get another one, or swap the two pourover setups. It makes a nice cup of coffee indeed. But I brewed some coffee (a gift) from Endgrain in nearby Pitman, NJ, and it was a perfect match.
2. The Aperol Spritz: This isn’t a new drink for us and I’ve surely written about it before here on Uncorrected, but we revived the Aperol Spritz this weekend, as we stayed home. Makes me excited about the imminent pool season, and having Fridays off.
3. Winget for Windows apps: The Microsoft Store is a joke next to Apple’s App Store on the Mac, but you can easily use PowerShell to search for apps instead of firing up the Store proper. This has the added benefit of exposing you to Git Hub apps you wouldn’t otherwise find in the Store.

Sous vide ribeyes and some chicken for Joe.

How much should we shield ourselves or others from the challenges of life? Are we nurturing resilience or inadvertently fostering fragility? Maybe it’s about finding that sweet spot where we’re supported enough to thrive but still exposed enough to grow strong and resilient. Sometimes, the very things that make us feel safe can hold us back from developing the strength we truly need.

A Bit Of Resistance Does Wonders

Today, during an interview (for once, I wasn’t in the hot seat) I learned about ambiverts and ambiversion. The candidate described herself this way, and I was intrigued by both the word and the concept.

It harkened back to my own second-round interview for the job I’m currently occupying. The superintendent asked me, in what he described as a strange question, whether I’d rather be a travel guide or a travel agent. I was intrigued by the question and it got me thinking, in that moment, about how I consider myself vs how I comport myself.

I do very much prize alone time and am comfortable being by myself most of the time. I’m also not likely to put myself in positions where I have to talk in front of groups of people, although I often feel better after having done so (and regret situations where I shy away from the challenge).

And I also thought about all of the times I’ve taken parents and students around to see a school they are curious about or reluctant to send their child, and I always heartily agreed to provide tours to parents. I like these situations because I often get a chance to talk about what I know, and also to exercise a little bit of persuasion.

And when I worked at the Camden County Educational Services Commission, I often found myself in a sales mode, trying to persuade customers to use our services. I was surprised by how much I got into this role, considering how little I every wanted to be in a sales position. I always considered it something I wasn’t suited to or interested in.

Anyway, ambiversion: The term was coined by Edmund Conklin, a psychologist, encompassing both extraversion and introversion. It’s not interesting, from a research perspective, because it’s normal:

In other words, ambiverts are simply healthy people, neither too extroverted nor too introverted. Some have argued that because of Conklin’s attempt to define the "normal," he’s the progenitor of positive psychology—remember that what was popular at the genesis of much psychology was defining what was going wrong in someone’s mind, not right.

Hans Eysenck [considered ambiversion](Extroversion-Ambiversion-Introversion – Arlene R Taylor PhD, Realizations Inc (arlenetaylor.org)) to account for the vast majority of people’s personality traits:

68% to 70% are estimated to fall in the middle of the continuum and are moderately alert when fully awake (Ambiverts). These individuals tend to function best with moderate or average levels of stimulation.

I like these seemingly obvious conclusions to our otherwise all-or-nothing orientation towards personality traits. Of course most people aren’t always extraverted or introverted. We’re both, depending upon the situation. I have often thought that, were we as a culture and a society less didactic about gender roles, young people would be less likely to declare a gender orientation and just be themselves. As a male brought up in a culture that celebrates extreme versions of masculinity, I don’t find the notion of switching identities personally alluring, but I have often longed for a more tolerant world.

If we can exist comfortably-normally-in between the two extremes of introversion and extraversion, we can surely understand and accept others, and ourselves, as living in between other polar opposites.

Here’s this week’s list of things to check out:

1. God Mode in Windows 11: This is a cool trick to expose settings in Windows.
2. Tiller HQ: Do you like using software to access your bank account but just can’t shake your preference for working in Excel? This (kinda expensive) Excel plugin does everything you want.
3. Chemex Pourover Brewer: I wrote about this this weekend, but I wanted to recommend it for Serial Sunday, as I’m enjoying the process of making (and drinking) the product. I will note that this method seems to take longer than my normal pourover using a Melita No. 4 filter and dripper. I probably need to coarsen my grind a notch on the burr grinder.

I’ve been trying to watch baseball for years. Today is day one.

Yesterday was my last day at Vineland Public Schools; on Monday, I move (back) to Monroe Township Public Schools, where I started my career, such as it is, in public education. I am sad to leave the district of my hometown, but excited about my new position. The work is the work, but the people at VPS are like family.